GET A FREE CONSULTATION OR SAMPLE TO GET YOUR PROJECT GOING.

Yes, I want my consultaion

Freedom from Bilingual Files Isn’t Always Fun

Most things in life come at a price, and so does OmegaT’s freedom from bilingual translation files. Since I wrote about how great it was not to have intermediate bilingual files in OmegaT, it is only fair now to describe also the “catch.”

Track changes

Tracking changes is a very useful function for a translation memory program, and particularly important for editing. It allows you to go back to a previous version of a translation. When an editor makes changes to the translation, a translator can review them easily and decide whether to accept or reject them.

Since OmegaT stores translations in a TMX file (project_save.tmx), it does not allow tracking changes. To review changes effectively, you need to use another tool such as the excellent Change Tracker to produce a comparison file that shows all changes made to a translation. It is a good workaround, but not as effective as working with tracked changes directly within OmegaT. For example, to reject changes, you need to open OmegaT and make those adjustments manually.

Segment statuses

No bilingual file means no segment statuses, because, just as with tracking changes, there is no place to store them. Statuses could come in quite handy, though.

For example, other translation programs allow filtering based on statuses. If I change a 100% match in SDL Trados Studio, the segment still keeps the 100% status, allowing me to keep handling it as such in the future. For instance, If a client asks me not to review 100% matches, I will want to skip them. Since other programs keep the status even after changes have been made to the segment, I can always filter out 100% matches, despite the changes that I made. In OmegaT, however, as soon as I change the 100% match, both the time and user name are changed, while this is the only information I can use to find 100% matches. So after changing a 100% match, I can no longer filter it out and might end up reviewing it, which is exactly what I want to avoid.

Alternative translations

Alternative translations are different translations of identical segments resulting from different context. For example, I might have very poor segmentation in source files—sentences split into several parts:

First sentence

As a global company, we must comply with the

U.K. Bribery Act

which has global reach.

Second sentence

The

U.K. Bribery Act

is a law enforced by the U.K. Government.

Due to bad segmentation, these two sentences have two identical segments “U.K. Bribery Act.” By default, these are auto-propagated; that is, changing one segment also changes the other one. Suppose I need to translate them differently, because, although identical, they are in different sentences and even in different parts of the sentence. Thus in the case of English to Russian translation, for example, I will need to make the translations different. For this purpose, I use the alternative translations function.

This function saves alternative translations at the end of my project’s translation memory, appending additional information to them:

  • File name
  • Preceding segment
  • Following segment

This information allows OmegaT to distinguish between two different translations in the translation memory and insert them in the right places.

Now, what if the file, preceding segment, and following segments are identical? Such situations are rare, but possible. Right now, OmegaT does not know how to deal with this. You can only resort to a workaround, such as changing the source files to make one of the segments unique. This is time-consuming compared to working on a bilingual file in another CAT program, where you simply disable auto-propagation and change the translations freely. Since those programs store translations directly in the translated files rather than in translation memory files, they do not need to rely on context.

In conclusion

Some of the above limitations may have already materialized in feature requests for the developers to consider. The question remains, though, is how we, as users, can help the developers implement these and other requests. One thing that I believe OmegaT could benefit from in this respect is crowdfunding, as suggested by Marco Cevoli. Users could let the developers know what they find to be most important to do in terms of OmegaT development by voting with their money.

Please disagree with me in the comments if you have a different opinion. If you liked this post, please let me know by “liking” Velior on Facebook.

3 comments

  • dasmi says:

    Just one consideration: tmx files *are* bilingual files.
    The problem with omegaT tmx is that it does not store segments in the same order in which they appear in the source file. I tried to open the omegaT tmx file with Okapi Olifant and then ordering it by segment creation date. To track change it, just copy the rows you are interested in as a table and edit it with a text editor (e.g. LibreOffice Writer). The changed target text can be pasted in Olifant and then the whole TM saved in the omegat project again.
    It is just a workaround and then you have a not-so-readable file because of tags, but that is a start.
    Another option could be to convert originals in xlf, translate them with omegaT and then revise them with an external editor.

    • Right, Davide. Strictly speaking, TMXs are bilingual files. I should have called them something like translatable bilingual files instead or translatable CAT tool files.
      I could add to your workaround a little bit: You can also export translations from OmegaT into another program, such as LibreOffice Writer, by using the excellent Kos’s script write_table.groovy. It will export all segments into an HTML table, which can be opened in any text processor.
      Thank you for your comment.

  • Amazing blog! Do you have any helpful hints for aspiring writers? I’m hoping to start my own blog soon but I’m a little lost on everything. Would you advise starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option? There are so many options out there that I’m completely confused .. Any ideas? Thank you!

Add comment


About the Author

Roman Mironov
Roman Mironov
CEO & Founder

As the founder of Velior, Roman has had the privilege of being able to turn his passion for languages into a business. He has over 15 years of experience in the translation industry. Roman has helped dozens of clients increase sales by making their products appealing for speakers of other languages.